Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Question about propellants

Discussion in 'Other Weapons' started by bigdunc, May 20, 2011.

  1. bigdunc

    bigdunc Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have read that the Germans used a low-flash propellant in their weapons,everything from small arms to tank rounds,while the U.S. used a higher flash propellant. Can anyone help me to verify this?
     
  2. Victor Gomez

    Victor Gomez Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    115
    You probably cannot make such generalizations as the flash of the propellant used in each shell depending on its size and needed distance will be designed specifically with a flash power that that shell needs. Likewise if you are talking about muzzle flash that may vary on the type of weapon you select and the type of shell you select. I am speaking generally of American weapons and someone else may be better able to speak of the German weapons. In a given artillery shell of the American type there could be a combination of several powders within the charge in some cases. The art of it is to create a burn that produces maximum power producing speed of the bullet at a rate that reaches maximum before leaving the barrel but does not create too much pressure too fast that would blow the barrel up with too much pressure too soon. That is why one propellant would not be proper for many different sizes of bullets. Although rifles may use similar propellants they would not be proper perhaps in a cannon or large artillery. Pistols and rifles in most cases would not be using the same propellants.;)
     
  3. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
  4. Victor Gomez

    Victor Gomez Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    115
    I book marked that page....is a good reminder how varied charges in a shell can be.....which reminds me of the many times we discovered the deterioration of powders that have interesting by products......interesting because the ether can anesthesize you if you open multiple cannisters of powder in an environment where there is not good air circulation (like a bunker) or the tell tale liquid that indicates deterioration and the by product of nitro-glycerin that makes the shell likely to explode from a small amount of static electricity. In old ordinance of which we have a great deal in our bunkers and storage facilities these hazards are present. Not a lot of attention is devoted to making anyone aware of this unless you are involved in demilling ordinance.
     

Share This Page